Skip to content

Times Best Law Firms 2023

|

Legal 500

|

Chambers and Partners

info@didlaw.com|Enquiry: 020 3868 0412 |Clients: 020 7099 7508

  • home
  • employees
    • disability discrimination
      • Reasonable Adjustments
      • Returning to work from sick leave
      • Time off work for depression
      • Time off work for anxiety
      • Bullying At Work
      • Harassment at work
      • Victimisation at work
      • Demoted at work
      • Sickness absence records
      • sickness absence
      • Disabilities
    • sex, pregnancy & maternity
      • Sex discrimination
      • Maternity Discrimination
      • Pregnancy
      • Protected Period
      • Maternity Leave
      • Sexual Harassment
      • return to work childcare issues
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Whistleblowing
      • redundancy from furlough
    • shielding & return to work
      • returning to work from furlough
      • returning to work from shielding
    • Age Discrimination
    • Redundancy
    • employee discrimination
    • Unfair Dismissal
    • constructive dismissal
    • disciplinary & grievances
    • Mental Health in The Workplace
    • stress at work
      • Personal injury
      • Nervous breakdown at work
    • holiday pay
    • Disability income protection
      • Group income protection
      • Termination payments tax free
    • The lawyer’s lawyer
  • employers
  • Employment Law News
  • about us
    • who
    • What
    • How
    • Why
    • Press & Media
      • hot topics videos
  • contact
    • Contact Us
    • Join Us
    • Support

FDA v the Prime Minister: Union loses battle to hold Priti Patel to account for bullying in parliament

FDA v the Prime Minister: Union loses battle to hold Priti Patel to account for bullying in parliament

The FDA union, which represents senior civil servants, has lost a High Court challenge over Boris Johnson’s decision to overrule the findings of his adviser on ministerial standards over Home Secretary Priti Patel’s alleged bullying in Parliament.

Members of Parliament are not subject to normal employment laws, but they are held to the standards of the Ministerial Code (the Code). Paragraph 1.2 of the Code suggests that “Harassing, bullying or other inappropriate or discriminating behaviour wherever it takes place is not consistent with the Ministerial Code and will not be tolerated.”

Allegations against Ms Patel came to light after the resignation of her most senior civil servant, Sir Philip Rutnam, in February 2020. Sir Philip revealed he had received allegations of Ms Patel shouting and swearing, belittling people and making unreasonable and repeated demands. He argued her behaviour had “created fear”.

Other claims included that a senior Home Office official had collapsed after being confronted by Ms Patel, following an unsuccessful all-night effort to reverse a High Court ruling. Another official was reported to have received a £25,000 pay-out after making bullying in Parliament claims against Ms Patel during her time as employment minister.

At the time, independent investigator Sir Alex Allan found that Ms Patel’s “approach on occasions has amounted to behaviour that can be described as bullying in terms of the impact felt by individuals” and that she was in breach of the Code.

Overturning Sir Alex’s decision, Mr Johnson said that after “weighing up all the factors” he had concluded the Code had not been breached. His decision prompted Sir Alex to resign in protest.

The High Court ruling found Mr Johnson had not misdirected himself to proceed on the basis that Ms Patel’s conduct would not fall foul of the Code if she was unaware of, or did not intend, the harm or offence caused.

This is interesting for two reasons. First, the decision comes on the heels of another scandal related to employment law (or the lack thereof) in Parliament. In November, Stella Creasy, a Labour MP, ignited a storm of controversy when she revealed she had been asked not to bring her 3-month-old baby into the chamber. Because Members of Parliament are not entitled to maternity leave, Ms Creasy had been routinely taking her infant with her to work. Both cases highlight the impact that a lack of clear rules governing employment relations in Parliament has on lawmakers.

Second, it highlights the lack of clarity around bullying – not just for Members of Parliament, but for everyone. Bullying is something we hear complained of quite often, but in reality, it is not possible to make a claim for “bullying” as a separate heading. The legal claim would normally be for harassment or victimisation, and both would need to be tied to a protected characteristic under the Equality Act (i.e. sex, race, disability, etc.). (This is obviously a big bugbear for me, because I have also whinged about it here.)

Parliament is undoubtedly an incredibly difficult place to work, particularly over the course of the pandemic. But it is disappointing how often stressful environments seem to excuse nasty behaviour towards our colleagues. Ultimately, the world would be a nicer place to live and work in if everyone was just a little decent to each other and we enforced a government anti-bullying policy.

This blog was written by Kendal Youngblood, Solicitor at didlaw.

Posted on 14th January 202210th January 2022
Posted in UncategorisedTagged FDA v the Prime Minister: Union loses battle to hold Priti Patel to account for bullying in parliament
  • london60 Gray’s Inn RoadLondon WC1X 8LU
  • info@didlaw.com 020 7099 7508
  • site content
    • The team
    • About Us
    • Join Us
    • What We Do
    • Our Values
    • Why
    • Contact Us
    • Press & Media
    • Employment Law News
    • Pricing & regulatory information
    • Useful Information
    • Privacy Policy
    • Support

  • Didlaw Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA number 605930). Supporting the work of the Legal Action Group.

© didlaw 2023 didlaw is a trading name of Didlaw Limited, a limited company registered in England & Wales under co. number 8642712.The registered office is 60 Grays Inn Rd, London WC1X 8LU. Solicitor | Director Karen Jackson. Non-lawyer | Director Chris Jackson

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • home
  • employees
    ▼
    • disability discrimination
      ▼
      • Reasonable Adjustments
      • Returning to work from sick leave
      • Time off work for depression
      • Time off work for anxiety
      • Bullying At Work
      • Harassment at work
      • Victimisation at work
      • Demoted at work
      • Sickness absence records
      • sickness absence
      • Disabilities
    • sex, pregnancy & maternity
      ▼
      • Sex discrimination
      • Maternity Discrimination
      • Pregnancy
      • Protected Period
      • Maternity Leave
      • Sexual Harassment
      • return to work childcare issues
    • Settlement Agreements
    • Whistleblowing
      ▼
      • redundancy from furlough
    • shielding & return to work
      ▼
      • returning to work from furlough
      • returning to work from shielding
    • Age Discrimination
    • Redundancy
    • employee discrimination
    • Unfair Dismissal
    • constructive dismissal
    • disciplinary & grievances
    • Mental Health in The Workplace
    • stress at work
      ▼
      • Personal injury
      • Nervous breakdown at work
    • holiday pay
    • Disability income protection
      ▼
      • Group income protection
      • Termination payments tax free
    • The lawyer’s lawyer
  • employers
  • Employment Law News
  • about us
    ▼
    • who
    • What
    • How
    • Why
    • Press & Media
      ▼
      • hot topics videos
  • contact
    ▼
    • Contact Us
    • Join Us
    • Support